The risk of injury is an inherent part of most constructions and a lot of heavy industry projects. We can't eliminate risk entirely, but we can reduce the risk and control it using standard procedures and good work practices. Or, we can just accept it as a normal part of doing a job. The question becomes "How much risk are you and your employees willing to accept?" job safety analysis procedures are critical in any business.
Just presenting "training" is not enough when trying to install any critical safety process, and in particular when developing an effective task evaluation to thoroughly identify risk and hazard characteristics of a given task. It is critical that an effective training program be designed so that it can be effectively deployed to make clear the specific customized safety needs.
The approach to establishing an effective evaluation should include: Employees should be brought into the hazard identification and hazard analysis. One obstacle that could inhibit employees from taking part is the misperception that work risk evaluation is a form of motion and time study. While it may help with improving the job, these are not purely efficiency studies directed at employee effectiveness. Training may be needed on the basics of hazard identification and the logistics for setting up the process will need to be reviewed.
At the lowest management level, risk has to be controlled by the people doing the work and their immediate supervisors. In both the planning and execution of a task, it is essential to make sure that all those who need to be involved are given an adequate opportunity to be involved and are kept informed of developments that might increase the risks and change the measures needed to deal with them.
The techniques to communicate issues and activities within the organization must be determined. The quality and depth of communications determine what messages and knowledge get through to all levels of the organization. An evaluation may indicate where communications are slowing, limiting full knowledge of uncontrolled hazards or known risk.
The key to success is to incorporate Job Hazard Analysis directly into the safety and risk control training program with employee involvement, and each employee must be trained on the aspects of their job specific task and demonstrate that they know how to protect themselves from recognized hazards if it is to be effective. In a nutshell, if the hazard knowledge has been conveyed, then supervision should be able to verify the employee's newly acquired skills through a demonstration of their knowledge of the safety controls mandated as well as why those controls are needed.
Well-timed responses or feedback to employees about concerns and findings must be planned. As Job risk Analyses, hazards and risk related questions develop, a combination of interviews, meetings and written communications must be promptly sent to the level of authority that can address the potential severity. As high severity issues are recognized, senior decision makers must be informed with immediate controls or even stern decisions taken until controls can be devised.
Other factors that may influence local risk management include the physical environment of the work area, work procedures (safe work practices), tools and resources available to eliminate or reduce the hazard. Risk management is a function that requires communication with a lot of stakeholders working together to complete a project. This includes information being passed from one contractor team to another which may be required for risk assessment and communication among other crew members. The goal is always the same.
Just presenting "training" is not enough when trying to install any critical safety process, and in particular when developing an effective task evaluation to thoroughly identify risk and hazard characteristics of a given task. It is critical that an effective training program be designed so that it can be effectively deployed to make clear the specific customized safety needs.
The approach to establishing an effective evaluation should include: Employees should be brought into the hazard identification and hazard analysis. One obstacle that could inhibit employees from taking part is the misperception that work risk evaluation is a form of motion and time study. While it may help with improving the job, these are not purely efficiency studies directed at employee effectiveness. Training may be needed on the basics of hazard identification and the logistics for setting up the process will need to be reviewed.
At the lowest management level, risk has to be controlled by the people doing the work and their immediate supervisors. In both the planning and execution of a task, it is essential to make sure that all those who need to be involved are given an adequate opportunity to be involved and are kept informed of developments that might increase the risks and change the measures needed to deal with them.
The techniques to communicate issues and activities within the organization must be determined. The quality and depth of communications determine what messages and knowledge get through to all levels of the organization. An evaluation may indicate where communications are slowing, limiting full knowledge of uncontrolled hazards or known risk.
The key to success is to incorporate Job Hazard Analysis directly into the safety and risk control training program with employee involvement, and each employee must be trained on the aspects of their job specific task and demonstrate that they know how to protect themselves from recognized hazards if it is to be effective. In a nutshell, if the hazard knowledge has been conveyed, then supervision should be able to verify the employee's newly acquired skills through a demonstration of their knowledge of the safety controls mandated as well as why those controls are needed.
Well-timed responses or feedback to employees about concerns and findings must be planned. As Job risk Analyses, hazards and risk related questions develop, a combination of interviews, meetings and written communications must be promptly sent to the level of authority that can address the potential severity. As high severity issues are recognized, senior decision makers must be informed with immediate controls or even stern decisions taken until controls can be devised.
Other factors that may influence local risk management include the physical environment of the work area, work procedures (safe work practices), tools and resources available to eliminate or reduce the hazard. Risk management is a function that requires communication with a lot of stakeholders working together to complete a project. This includes information being passed from one contractor team to another which may be required for risk assessment and communication among other crew members. The goal is always the same.
About the Author:
If you are searching for the facts about job safety analysis procedures, come to our web pages online today. More details are available at http://www.safetypoliciesprocedures.com/contact now.
No comments:
Post a Comment